Real domicile vs Domicile of convenience: an application in Luxembourg case law in service of process within the EU

24 gennaio 2025

Share this article

On October 18, 2024, a Luxembourg court issued a decision[1] emphasizing the gap between actual and fiscal or administrative domicile, especially in cross-border legal enforcement.

The issue originated from the necessity to authenticate the delivery of a Luxembourg exequatur order in France, which upheld a 2017 French court decision. This verdict ordered the defendant to pay specific amounts, resulting in asset seizures in Luxembourg. The defendant claimed residency in Russia, complicating the enforcement process.


In the absence of the defendant when service was made (“signification à personne”), the court used the "faisceau d'indices" methodology to ascertain the defendant's true residence, which is a thorough examination of evidence to establish factual reality, and therefore the validity of the delivery to his residence (“signification à domicile”).

·         The defendant's true habitation was a château in France, as evidenced by his name on the château's mailbox and testimony from neighbours and château staff.

·         The defendant was listed as the château's contact person on a business website.

·         Additional verifications and inspections made on the spot by French bailiff who could therefore validly serve the decision according to French Laws.

In defense, the defendant contended for fiscal presence in Russia, showing papers including French tax records showing a Russian address, a resident permit issued in Russia, passport mentions, consular certifications, and a "certificate of life" from the French consulate in Moscow. The defendant further stated that the château was owned by a firm and rented out to third parties. Despite these assertions, the court determined that fiscal or administrative paperwork did not overcome the substantial presumption of true domicile based on factual evidence,.

The judgment confirmed that the exequatur order was validly served, hence confirming the asset seizure. Though the verdict is now being appealed and lacks res judicata authority, this conclusion is consistent with Luxembourg case law, which favors factual proof of residence above administrative or fiscal appearances. The case emphasizes the significance of extensive factual investigations in legal situations involving domicile and cross-border execution of decisions, particularly for matters introduced before 10/01/2015 under EU legislation governing civil and commercial judgments (Brussels I). Indeed, since that date, national decisions rendered in the EU do not need to go through the exequatur procedure anymore in order to be enforced in another EU Member State (Brussels 1 bis regime).

 

 



[1] Civil Judgement 2024TALCH10/0013, n° TAL-2018-00560


Recent Posts

21 ottobre 2026
Introduction Attracting and retaining international executive talent has long been a strategic priority for Luxembourg’s financial and corporate sectors. As part of the upcoming 2027 budgetary measures, the Luxembourg government has submitted Draft Law No. 8782 to Parliament, introducing a comprehensive overhaul of the tax framework governing stock options. Set to apply to options granted starting from tax year 2027, the legislative proposal replaces legacy administrative practices with a codified statutory structure, while introducing an exceptionally advantageous tax track for innovative start-ups. Pillar 1: The Favorable Regime for Innovative Young Enterprises (JEI) To reinforce Luxembourg's position as a dynamic hub for European venture capital and technology ventures, the bill introduces a specialized tax status under Articles 100bis and 104ter of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law (L.I.R.). For eligible Innovative Young Enterprises (Jeunes Entreprises Innovantes - JEI), the framework radically shifts the standard taxation timeline: Zero upfront taxation: The benefit-in-kind is valued at zero euros upon both grant and exercise. Deferred realization: Taxation applies solely at the disposal of the acquired equity. Favorable rate: Capital gains realized upon disposal are taxed as extraordinary income pursuant to Article 132 L.I.R., applying a reduced rate equal to one-quarter of the taxpayer's global tax bracket. Company Qualification Criteria To qualify under the JEI mechanism, an entity must satisfy cumulative statutory requirements: Incorporated for less than 10 years and registered with the Trade and Companies Register (RCS); Headcount under 150 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees, with a minimum operational staff of 2 FTEs; Annual net turnover or balance sheet total not exceeding 30 million euros; Demonstrated research and development commitment, representing at least 15 percent of total operating expenditure in at least one of the three preceding financial years, duly certified by an independent auditor or chartered accountant. Pillar 2: Codification of the General Regime (Article 104bis L.I.R.) For commercial enterprises that do not meet the JEI benchmarks, or where employers elect not to apply the start-up framework, the reform formalizes statutory rules under Article 104bis L.I.R., moving away from historical reliance on administrative circulars and creating absolute legal certainty. The codified general framework establishes two explicit operational tracks: Freely transferable options: Subject to taxation at the date of grant, evaluated on fair market value less any consideration paid by the employee. Non-transferable options: Taxed at the moment of exercise based on recognized financial methodologies, such as Black-Scholes valuation models. Mandatory holding relief: Where underlying shares are subject to contractually binding lock-up periods, employees benefit from a flat statutory discount of 5 percent per restricted year, capped at a maximum deduction of 20 percent, subject to statutory employer reporting. Transitional Rules: Impact on Existing Corporate Plans Draft Law No. 8782 establishes a clear cut-off criterion based strictly on the grant date: Legacy grants: All stock options granted prior to tax year 2027 remain governed by the legal and tax principles in force at the time of allocation. Future allocations: Any options granted from 2027 onwards will automatically fall under the amended statutory regime. This statutory rule applies irrespective of whether options are awarded under an existing corporate equity incentive plan or a newly drafted framework. Companies are not required to redraft existing overarching plan documentation, but subsequent allocations must be structured around the reformed statutory thresholds. Strategic Takeaways With parliamentary review currently underway, corporate employers, start-ups, and private equity-backed groups should conduct an early audit of their remuneration architecture. Reviewing plan terms and R&D expenditure metrics today will allow businesses to optimize incentive packaging ahead of the 2027 implementation date. BLB in Law can assist corporate groups, start-ups and VCs in designing compliant incentive structures. For strategic legal guidance, contact our team. 
24 aprile 2026
As from 2025, Luxembourg offers a 50% tax exemption on salaries up to €400,000 for highly qualified professionals.
3 febbraio 2026
The law creating Social impact companies (SIS) was adopted in December 2016, after ongoing debates and discussions on the establishment of a specific legal status for businesses in the social and solidarity economy.
17 dicembre 2025
Investment structuring with Luxembourg and Mauritius SPVs: an ideal route for European investments towards Africa and Asia
28 luglio 2025
Thinking about the right jurisdiction for your holding structure?
31 maggio 2025
The Reserved Alternative Investment Fund (RAIF) has become an extremely popular investment structure since its introduction in Luxembourg in 2016.
5 maggio 2025
Luxembourg, together with Ireland, remains the location of choice for securitisation activities.
7 aprile 2025
On 17 February 2025, Luxembourg took a significant step in aligning with EU company law by transposing the Mobility Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/2121) into national legislation.
14 marzo 2025
Though directors of Luxembourg-based corporations are protected by the so called “corporate shield”
21 febbraio 2025
Shareholders’ agreements (commonly abbreviated as SHA) are widely used in corporate structures.
Show More